-=> Quoting Rod Gasson to Greg Harper <=-

 GH> Well, if you are reading this, then I
 GH> have been successful at using a foreign olr.
 RG> Boo, hiss....

Thought you'd be impressed.  
 RG> And just as importantly, the things that it has missing WRT QWKRR. :-)

Someone's got to keep you on your toes.  :-)

 RG> So you read the manual huh ?   

What manual.  :-)  Ahh, that thing I used to mop up the spilt Coke?
 RG> Yes, please do.  I still think that you'll find all netmail formatting
 RG> needs to be performed manually, but if not, then I'm still very
 RG> interested as to how it works, what formats it knows, etc, etc.

Well, of the QWK progs I have used, no success.  One even gave me a message
saying you can't use qwk with netmail!   HA HA. Wrong!
 RG> Unfortunately a QWKRR spell checker is a long way off.

Not really needed, but just mentioning it anyway.

 RG> Anyway, I really am interested on how QWKRR compares with other OLR's.

This is my idea too.  I can't use these pewters everyday like I can
with my trusty 128.

 RG> I notice that Even though MarkD has the choice he is still using
 RG> pats on the back. What I am interested in is ways to close the
 RG> remaining gaps, and simply make QWKRR even better.

Well, I hope I can shed some light on some of the nifty features these
*other* platform programs offer.

Greg


 RG> ___ QWKRR128 V4.3b [R]

 RG> -!- EzyQwk V1.10b1
 RG>  ! Origin: WOW BBS - Commodore Suport, Sydney's West (3:713/888)

... Don't catch the BlueWave, use a 128 instead!!!!
___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.12

--- Maximus 2.01wb




SD®¯Å¨