Doug Nazar wrote in a message to Joel Downer:

JD> Doesn't OS/2 place a limit on the number of active threads?  If so, and
JD> given that some people might want to run very large BBS'es on an OS/2
JD> LAN (100+ nodes), couldn't there be some problems with this approach?
JD> I'm not aware that there's any reason that a 100-thread server process
JD> is *impossible*, but isn't that a log of resources to hog for one door?

 DN> The THREADS= config.sys parameter sets the maximum thread
 DN> count (upto 4096). Each thread does comsume some resourses
 DN> but anyone who can afford a hundred-line bbs should be able
 DN> to afford the memory .

All the THREADS parameter does is allocate more static IORBs at system
boot.  If you even notice the memory difference, you're in big trouble.
 
-- Mike


---