From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: epwise{at}yahoo.com
Subject: Re: One woman's opinion

"Bast"  wrote in
news:kqepoq$1l5$1{at}dont-email.me: 

> 
> 
> Wiseguy wrote:
>> "Daniel47{at}teranews.com"  wrote in
>> news:Cxiyt.50039$ny5.21612{at}newsfe24.iad:
>>
>>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>>> http://thisfeliciaday.tumblr.com/post/50858883769/star-trek-movie-
>> spoi
>>>> lerzzzz
>>>>
>>> Quote   "and I particularly like some of the secondary characters,
>>> Spock was excellent, etc etc" End Quote
>>>
>>> If Spock was a "secondary character", who were the etc etc
>>> characters??
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>
>> She didn't say Spock was a secondary character.  She made statements
>> concerning why she enjoyed the movie, separated by a comma.
>>
>> 1.  I particularly like some of the secondary characters.
>> 2.  Spock was excellent.
>>
>> "etc. etc." means other reasons she enjoyed the movie (which she
>> didn't mention) not other characters.
>>
>> She perhaps could have written it better but it is clear what she
>> meant. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> No she is not clear at all. Other than she felt the Female characters
> were weak.

I didn't say she was clear...I said it was clear what she meant.
I was presuming some intellect on the part of the reader.

> ...So even Feminist's didn't like it.
> 

Plural of feminist is feminists.

> Oh ya and she said,..."It was really noisy ",.....see my comments
> about Jar Jar Binks/Abrams and gratuitous overdone CGI explosions, to
> make up for a lack of storyline.
> 
> 
> 

--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux