Russell, at 13:22 on May 17 1996, you wrote ...

PE>>>>>> I never saw Russell's original.  Since David saw it, 
PE>>>>>> either me, Bill, or David have lost it.  I keep all my 
PE>>>>>> inbound mail, so will take a look from my end.  Bill + 
PE>>>>>> David, can you do the same. Inbound and outbound.  BFN.  
PE>>>>>> Paul.

BG>>>>> I don't think the original was posted on a TML echo 
BG>>>>> (might have been netmail, in fact), and David has 
BG>>>>> x-posted it here for some reason.  David?

RB>>>> The original WAS posted in LOCUSER on the 11th.
RB>>>> I have sent it again today.

RB>>>> Russell

DD>>>> Where?  I didn't get it again today . . .

DD>>>> David

PE>>> Bill, I did not get that message above, which Russell 
PE>>> wrote at 09:47 on May 13 1996, to you.  That was almost 
PE>>> CERTAINLY posted in LOCUSER, because it's got a subject 
PE>>> line which I created. He would have had to cross-post out 
PE>>> of LOCUSER, for me to miss it. Who's stuffing around, and 
PE>>> with what?

DD>> I've figured it out!  Russell's messages cause Squish to 
DD>> comment that there is
DD>> no seen by line.

RB> Thanks David,

RB> Does this mean that none of my messages for the last two 
RB> weeks have got out.

Dunno, some of them certainly didn't even get here.

RB> I have just checked my setup & enabled seen-by's, now.

RB> We will see what happens now.

RB> BTW, did you get the netmail with the ram prices then)
RB> (32meg 70ns Simms {at} $599)

Yes, netmail coming back shortly.

David
@EOT:

--- Msgedsq/2 3.10