Hello Roy.

14 May 06 17:01, you wrote to me:

 MvdV>> I know of no one who was booted out by 5 to 0.

 RW> Sure you do, you just won't admit it.

So give me the names of the five that booted him out.

 MvdV>> But it might be the IC who tries to be instrumental in
 MvdV>> impeaching a ZC.

 RW> Only if a majority of the RCs in a zone wish to initiate it.

If that is ever going to happen it won't be Z2 that sets the precedent. It
will be the fight'onet champions in Z1. And we know what happens to an IC
that has the audacity to stand up against the Z1C.

 RW>>> He's trying to relate the RCC to the ZCC,

 MvdV>> After you put him on the wrong foot by dragging the RCC in.

 RW> Anyone who comprehends the English language will come to the same
 RW> conclusion

You realize you put yourself open to an accusation of exploiting someone
else's handicap?

If you weRe honest in your apparent support for Vladimir's cause, you would
have told him flat out that he is wasting his time going for an IC
intervention instead of pulling up a smoke screen. But Of course you don't
really care shit about his cause. All *you* want is to stir up some more
shit like you always do.

 MvdV>> The RCC is a Z1 thing, there is no RCC in Z2.

 RW>>> the latter of which is mentioned in policy and the former is
 RW>>> only an assumption made by the reader.

 MvdV>> Yeh, your assumption.

 RW> Logical conclusion.

Indeed, it is a logical conclusion that it is merely your assumption.

 RW>  I know you're not capable of that kind of comprehension,

I know that you are incapable of responding with anyhting other than an
accusation of ignorance when you are beaten.

Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20060315