RW>I have to agree with Charles.  The only reason a LEO
  >would need a unit like this would be to record things
  >having to do with his work.  It maybe recording himself
  >at traffic stops to protect himself from someone
  >accusing him of wanting/taking a bribe or recording
  >evidence of a crime.
RW>If it ever comes down to using a tape like that in
  >court I would think it would be more or less useless
  >once it is known that the recorder can be switched on
  >and off.
That was my point.  I wasn't suggesting that my freind would use
the device improperly...........I was suggesting that a defense
attorney would clobber the prosecutions' taped evidence once it
was known that the recorder could selectively be turned on and off.
CHARLES HUNTER
 * 1st 2.00 #9124 * When the going gets tough it's time for a nap
--- QScan/PCB v1.19b / 01-0671
---------------