* Crossposted from: Blue Wave
Steve Hayes is replying to Don Alt, who wrote to All on 09 Aug 96 15:13:24:
Hi Don,
I know this is an old message, but I came across it when I was archiving mail
to stiffies, and thought I would reply anyway :-)
DA> As an aside, almost all "word processors" like Word Perfect, MS-Word,
DA> and WordStar, both DOS and Windows versions, also support this
DA> feature, but it is from these word processors that folks in Fidonet
DA> got this idea and added them in the proposed specs in FTS-0001 Rev 16.
DA> You see, most DOS and other editors, including editors for Windows,
DA> put a hard carriage return (CR) and line feed (LF) at the end of every
DA> line and every time the [ENTER] key is used. The CRLF is Hex 0D0A or
DA> Decimal 1410. The above named editors cannot handle having CRLFs at
DA> the end of every line. They only expect a CRLF (carriage return & line
DA> feed) at the end of every paragraph, instead of at the end of every
DA> line. Thus, these editors screw up quoted lines.
DA> The Internet (pvt email) and the Usenet (public Newsgroups like Fido
DA> echoes), do not use "free flowing text" either. It's just the
DA> opposite, the Internet and Usenet specs demand that each line have a
DA> CRLF.
DA> This puts Internet/Usenet in conflict with the proposed Fidonet specs
DA> and is one of several reasons why the Fidonet proposed specs never
DA> became official.
DA> As a result, editors like TimEd, GoldEd, and the editors in FrontDoor
DA> and GEdit cannot be used for Internet pvt Email or for posting in any
DA> UseNet newsgroup. Yet they are still being used here in Fidonet
DA> because the soft- ware authors jumped the gun and assumed things they
DA> should have assumed. They assumed the specs for free flowing text
DA> would become Fidonet law, and they were wrong.
DA> Other editors, in fact the _majority_ of editors, and there are
DA> thousands of them to choose from, do not have free flowing text and do
DA> insert a CRLF at the end of every line. This is the _correct_ way to
DA> it and how messages should be done.
DA> Of all the people around the word who use OLMRs (offline mail
DA> readers) virtually 99.999% of them use editors that do put CRLFs at
DA> the end of each line, as should be. In the QWK mail format, which
DA> thousands of people use to do their offline mail, free formed text is
DA> prohibited. The QWK specs forbid free formed text... yet "free flowing
DA> text" is still being used in the QWK format in direct violation of the
DA> QWK specs.
I am using a word processor called XyWrite to write this message, and like
most word processors, it only puts a CRLF at the end of paragraphs, not at
the end of lines.
Does that screw things up for you?
I suggest that it doesn't, because when Blue Wave saves the message, it
automatically puts in CRLFs at the right places - at least when it is using
native Blue Wave packets, instead of QWK ones. If I use QWK, I then have to
remember to press enter at the end of each line, otherwise people using
brain-dead readers can't read them (Blue Wave handles them fine).
DA> Note that it is usually only SysOps who use "free flowing text." It
DA> is because GoldEd, TimEd and the other editors with the "free flowing
DA> text" feature are BBS support software. And if these SysOps are using
DA> the QWK format then they are violating the QWK specs. :-) Doesn't
DA> every BBS have a "QWK Mail door?" :-)
Yes, I have one, it came bundled with Silver Xpress :-)
DA> Sysops! It's time to replace your old editors like GoldEd, TimEd and
DA> etc that are complying to proposed Fido specs that never became
DA> official with a better editor that can handle CRLFs at the end of
DA> every line so quoting stops getting screwed up. Why use old fashioned
DA> and outdated software?
The trouble is, I've never found any editor, or word processor for that
matter, to beat XyWrite.
My wife just installed the latest version of MS Word on a new computer for
the office. It has more bells and whistles, but no more features. I freely
admit that XyWrite lacks talking paper clips and gesticulating Einsteins. But
though it is now 10 years old, it still PROCESSES WORDS better than any
"upgrade" I've ever seen.
I'll gladly update my software when the newer programs are better than the
old. But the trouble is, they are not as good. XyWrite and Blue Wave work for
me.
DA> The world is getting smaller. Already the Blue Wave offline mail
DA> reader and others can do Internet pvt email and Usenet newsgroups.
DA> They comply to both the Fidonet specs and the Internet/Usenet specs.
DA> Is it unreasonable for users to expect their SysOps of setting a good
DA> example by complying to specifications? No. That is not
DA> unreasonable! SysOps are supposed to know the rules and be setting
DA> good examples.
I regularly use Blue Wave with XyWrite for internet e-mail, and haven't had
any problems with people not being able to read my messages.
What does cause me problems is messages OTHER people send with HTML code in -
they obviously haven't learnt to distinguish between a Web page and an e-mail
message.
DA> SysOps, please STOP using anal-retentive software that screws up the
DA> works... especially in Fidonet echoes!
What does "anal-retentive" mean in this context?
Constipated?
My employer insisted that we use a very expensive kind of mail software
called Novell GroupWise (formerly Word Perfect office). The stupid thing
can't even do proper reply quoting.
And I see dozens of e-mail messages written by people whose software can't do
proper reply quoting. And they are using far more recent software than my
"outdated" Blue Wave/XyWrite combination.
I'll "upgrade" when the new software can perform better than the old. At the
moment, as far as I can see, it performs a lot worse.
Let me know if you have problems reading this message :-)
Keep well,
Steve Hayes
E-mail: steveh@khanya.bbs.co.za
WWW: http://www.geocities.com/Athens/7734
... Steve Hayes - Editorial Department, University of South Africa
--- WtrGate 0.92.p5 gamma Unreg
---------------
* Origin: Unisa Editorial, Pretoria, Gauteng, RSA 27-12-429-8641 (5:7106/20)
|