18 May 06 11:40, Vladimir Donskoy wrote to Roy Witt:

 VD> Hi Roy!

 VD> Wednesday May 17 2006, Roy Witt wrote to Vladimir Donskoy:

 VD>>> You don't answer for my question "what word ELECTION use in this
 VD>>> place of Policy"? Who make ELECTION (answer - IC) and whom his
 VD>>> elect (as overseer)? Other his work describe this (referenda,
 VD>>> ballots and so on), I ask you about first word only.

 RW>> For simplicity in the equation of what you want out of policy, there
 RW>> is no such thing as an election of *Cs.  You have to go outside of
 RW>> policy to find elections.

 VD> Word "election" use in Policy, so - elections are exist :-) !

Yes, but no elections for any *Cs.

 VD> In real live exist "election committtee (or commission)"
who initiate
 VD> and process of elect, summaries votes and approve wins.

Yes, all sanctioned by a governmental authority.

 VD> In the FIDO such absent so it's replaced by IC

No.

 VD> (and another *Cs for theirs low levels) - not ZCC as write there.

Even though there is no mention of an RCC, there is such a thing as
mentioned in the ZC impeachment procedings of 8.7.1, and they take a vote
on the referendum proposed by the majority of the RCs in that zone. They
also take a vote on policy change referendums, but that is all. They do
not, per policy, vote in elections of *Cs and only make selections of NCs.

There is also mention of a ZCC, which carries more weight than a 'RCC', in
such things as policy complaints, where the ZCC can override a decision of
the IC.



 VD> Regards, Vladimir Donskoy

 VD> --- GoldED+/W32-MINGW 1.1.5-b20060326

Roy
--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000