Anthony Cresap wrote:
>
> Why the double standard? Because guns are built for the pupose of killing.
> Cars are not.
>
> David Lentz wrote:
>
> > Anthony Cresap wrote:
> > >
> > > My bother-in-law was shot dead in the street by a drunk, right in front of
> > > my sister and nephew.
> > >
> > > Personally, I think NRA members should be lined up against a wall and shot
> > > with their own guns.
> > >
> > > Mike Haas wrote:
> >
> > If your brother in law was run over by a car, would you want to
> > shoot everybody in the American Automobile Association? If yes,
> > why the excess hostility? If no, why the double standard?
> >
> > Further, as your brother in law was shot by a drunk, do you favor
> > summary execution of all the farmers who grew the grain for the
> > alcohol?
Guns are not designed to kill. Rather they are designed to fire
a projectile. What that projectile does is up to the user of the
gun to decide.
So back to the question, a person was killed by a drunk driver
should be summarily execute all grain farmers, and if not why
not?
David
--
qyragm10@ebpurfgre.ee.pbz
|