| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Immediate Action Require |
>>> Yes, >>> 1:202/22 works for me... >> Hmmmm... In today's FidoNet the guy could probably set up the number and go >> right to an echomail source and =possibly= get a feed, depending on who he >> contacts. Scary thought. JK> I don't know about your software, but mine would balk at a node not JK> in the nodelist.. even if it was an internet node. ECHOMAIL? Note above I said echomail source. Maybe for netmail, but not echomail being distributed? :> It happened recently ... A guy who was out of FidoNet for a few years getting echomail until questioned that the node number didn't exist. I wasn't saying *I* would offer echomail to an unlisted node... was just being "funny" thinking about a few months back when somebody got reuinted with their old net after recieveing, and sending (seen by everybody) echomail on his old node number. Your system will NOT balk at echomail that is being distributed with the rest of it... what mailer or tosser checks "echomail" origin lines against the nodelist. What stops it so long as the echo uplink has them configured in? Maybe you misunderstood the point, even though there really was no point.... just an observation from what has already happened, and to the reality of what FidoNet is today to itself when it all boils down to it. Or maybe is it that you -thought- I meant something else, and were looking for an opportunity to belittle me because I blame the degression of FidoNet in Z1 on those who have ignored the -real- issues here and made the biggest things out of the most unimportant crap as if we still had 30,000 nodes (and part of that loss a result of it) to worry about... and I make no secrets about it? My software works fine, BTW, so don't worry about saying "I don't know about you're software"... What *I* use set most of the standards until the YAMOLI people from Z1 threw any "standards" out the window and drove almost all the serious developers away. FD 2.33ml (registered... SETTER of standards) FMail 2.60 (registered even though freeware/non-commercial) EleBBS -now- but prior *ProBoard* (registered...at one time TOP of the line and blew the likes of RA away!) BinkD (freeware... only used to accomodate YAMOLI stuff and bastardized standards) TransX ... for FTP use with nodes... (registered) Name the issues with the above software that you "don't know about". Bye, Phil --- FMail/Win32 1.60 Netwo (1:267/169)* Origin: ==>== part of the NYCap/Adirondack SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 5030/786 @PATH: 267/169 106/1 2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.