Hello Bj”rn.

16 May 06 17:33, you wrote to Janis Kracht:

 JK>> When you have a system wanting to belong to both "zone 8's",
 JK>> that's when you will run into problems... I would have figured
 JK>> you knew that.

 BF>    Why should he? Here in zone 2 we follow EchoPol1 that clearly
 BF> outlines how inter-zonal communications are to be maintained. No
 BF> problems at all -- only to those that has rejected EP1, fortunately
 BF> now a tiny minority of FidoNet.


        Ya know this majority, minority, mine is bigger than yours
crap is a joke. After awhile those that keep spounting such nonsense
just are not payed that much attention too. We are all part of the same
group (Network) except maybe for those that keep telling everyone how much
bigger and better they are than everyone else.

        If those in zone 2 choose to follow EP1 that's their choice even
if they know that such a policy will cause problems for others. Course
they had to care about that fact in the first place. In this case it
looks like they didn't.

        It seems silly to knowingly use a zone number that is already
is use. One would think that preventing problems would be better than
having to fix them later. Guess common sense wasn't important enough
to have been used. 


 BF> ---

Jeff

--- FMail/Win32 1.60