> I don't know what's wrong with your computer, but here Qbasic 
 > does it in 23.78125 seconds.  And QuickBasic, the one that 
 > would be a better comparison to PowerBasic, does it in 
 > 1.589844 seconds!
Nothing wrong with my computer; it's just an old 486/25.
I was interested in the difference in the numerical results achieved, rather 
than the time that it took to achieve them.
--- Msgedsq 2.2e
---------------