In a message dated 21 Nov 96  08:14:08, Dennis Mummert wrote:
 DM> evidence couldn't be used in employee screening.
RW>That's like telling a jury NOT to think of a pink elephant - it is still
RW>there in their minds - and a "negative" employee screening will still be
RW>in the minds of the employer.
 DM> Just another good reason NOT to allow chemical drug testing, or using
 DM> that evidence in court.
I agree. Unless you want to collect SS where drug or alcohol addiction is a 
reason for benefits.....
--- DLG Pro v1.16g1/PDQMail v2.60
(1:209/245)
---------------