Bob Ackley -> Earl Croasmun wrote:
 BA> Replying to a message of Earl Croasmun to Bob Ackley:

 ~>>> My point is still valid, Earl.  The point I was making and which
 EC>> you apparently ~> missed is that the "Pledge of
Allegiance" - with or
 EC>> without that "under God" ~> phrase - did not exist
at the Founders'
 EC>> time

 EC>> I have yet to see ANYONE claim that the Pledge of Allegiance existed
 EC>> back then!

 BA> Ms. Palin: "If it was good enough for the Founding Fathers, it's good
 BA> enough for me."

 BA> She seems to think that the pledge, and that phrase, was familiar to the
 BA> founders.
 BA> Obviously it was not.

 BA> Now, if you want to refer to the sentiment or idea expressed by 'under
 BA> God' that's
 BA> all well and good, but that isn't what she was referring to.  Or if she
 BA> was, she
 BA> certainly expressed herself poorly.

"my Muslim faith"

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net

http://www.myspace.com/fcpnmimi

Whatcha reading?

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)