Jonathan Fingas wrote in a message to Patrick McCullough:
 PM>  Nope... but I'd say Apogee spent those years making a better game
 PM>  -ROTT- and then created Duke3d, which is a quantum leap beyond Doom.
JF>   How is ROTT better than Doom?  The engine harks back to
JF> Wolfenstein 3D, not Doom.  No non-orthogonal (i.e. something other
JF> than 90 degree angles) walls, simpler lighting effects, and no
 Doom had non-orthogonal walls?  Perhaps an occasional 45 degree angle,
 but not much else.  90-degree walls were the vast majority.  ROTT has lots
 of curved walls and objects.
 And as far as lighting effects, they seem about the same, although ROTT
 had things like lamps while Doom only had panels of one color.  And most
 of the lighting in ROTT can be destroyed by gunfire. 
JF> elevation changes.  True, there was 11-player network play... but
 ROTT has the Mercury wings, the elevator pads, the rounded stairs,
 and the flying transport things.  Not to mention what happens if you
 fly off into space.  Gives me vertigo -Duke3D doesn't do that, nor
 Descent.
JF> how many people used that?  And none of the enemies could really
JF> scare you like a demon lunging out of the darkness.
 Funny how the ROTT enemies can actually shoot straight, though.  The
 guys in Doom just kinda stand around.  The demons... well... the
 grenade throwers in ROTT seem a lot more dangerous.
 And ROTT talks, too, which adds a something to the play.
 PM>  If they were sitting, where'd ROTT come from?  :)
JF>   It came from a quick, hurried effort to cash in on the 3D action
JF> craze - not some next-generation, genre-busting game.  
  Hurried?  Sure doesn't play like a hurried, rush of a hacked game.
  Plays as well -if not better- than a lot of other "current" games.
  It's not as techically advanced as Duke3d, but I can sure see an
  evolution here -and a good one. 
 PM>  (Everyone can bash me for thinking ROTT is better, but it's not going
 PM>  to change how I feel.  I just wish I'd played ROTT first.  There would
 PM>  have been no need to bother with Doom.)
JF>     What's the big appeal to ROTT?  The only thing I could see
JF> that was better was the weapons, and even then it was just a lot of
JF> variations on the rocket launcher.
 The whole game runs better.  It's that simple.  Doom may be bloodier
 or whatever, and have a catchy name... but the engine is clunkier,
 the motion more jittery, the sound effects and music aren't nearly
 as good (especially the music *gag*), and it's not as scary.
 MY opinion, of course.
 Doom has value, of course.  But it seems kinda like a rehash of
 the Beta vs. VHS war.  Beta was better and lost out anyway.
 But then Sony made 8mm and Hi-8, so perhaps that equates to
 Duke3D and Shadow Warrior or Duke4.
 I've played with Quake and Chasm.  They both remind me a LOT of
 "LameDuke."  The enemies move the same way.  :)
 Duke3D's enemies have a much more fluid movement, though still
 predictable at times.  It'll be very interesting to see how
 they move in Shadow Warrior. 
 Patrick
--- timEd/386 1.10
---------------