| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Slipstream installs |
From: "Rich"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C3457E.E88211A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
SP4 includes the latest release of the same version in Windows 2000 =
which is the download to which I referred. The download to which you =
referred is for a version not included in Windows 2000.
Now if you were a bit more observant you would have noticed on the =
right side of the page to which you referred a big blue box labeled =
"Related Resources" with links to "JScript 5.1 Security
Patch for = Windows 2000", "JScript 5.5 Secuity Patch for Windows
2000", "Sec All = Available Security Updates for Windows
Script". The first two are = obvious. The last refers to a page that
includes links to all the = updates for the 5.1, 5.5, and 5.6 versions.
Are you ready to acknowledge you are wrong yet?
Rich
"Geo." wrote in message =
news:3f0b5bf5$1{at}w3.nls.net...
go here =
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03-008.asp
that's the security alert, click on the link for the W2K patch, what =
do you
see?
Geo.
"Rich" wrote in message news:3f0a65f5{at}w3.nls.net...
You didn't check, did you? SP4 includes version 5.1.0.8513 of
JSCRIPT.DLL. Not 5.6.0.8513 because Windows 2000 doesn't include =
version
5.6 of the Windows Scripting component. The download which you =
probably
meant to refer to is
=
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=3Da9eecbf9-019c-=
4667-8943-2b0142591b9e&displaylang=3Den.
Rich
"Geo." wrote in message =
news:3f0a1fae$1{at}w3.nls.net...
=
http://microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=3D824B1BD4-B4D6-49D5=
-8C58-199BDC731B64&displaylang=3Den
Geo. (it's not included in SP4)
"Rich" wrote in message news:3f08b349{at}w3.nls.net...
You tell me what it is and provide a URL like the KB article and =
maybe
I
can. It's not like it is difficult to keep track of. I gave you =
how to
keep up to date for security. If you want all the published updates =
since
SP4 and not just those from security bulletins, see
=
http://support.microsoft.com/common/canned.aspx?R=3Dd&H=3DMicrosoft%20Win=
dows%202000%20Post-SP4%20Fixes&LL=3D&Sz=3DkbWin2000preSP5fix&Fr=3D&DU=3D&=
SD=3DGN&LN=3DEN-US&CND=3D1&VR=3D&CAT=3D&VRL=3D&SG=3D&MaxResults=3D250.
The bit in red is the significant bit.
Rich
"Geo." wrote in message =
news:3f088986$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Then explain js56nen2K_SP5.exe
Geo. (whoops, guess the guys running technet forgot about the java =
patch
huh?)
"Rich" wrote in message news:3f084d78{at}w3.nls.net...
Yep. SP4 and MS03-22. You can see this yourself by visiting
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/current.asp.
Rich
"Geo." wrote in message
news:3f07e5cc$1{at}w3.nls.net...
It's got nothing to do with remembering what I installed, if I =
were to
setup
a new W2K server today, can you list the patches required to =
bring it
current? Go for it Rich, lets see if you are capable of doing =
such a
simple
task.
Geo.
"Rich" wrote in message news:3f07b5fa$1{at}w3.nls.net...
Why can't you remember what you installed? Do you pay =
attention?
If
so,
why is it so difficult for you to remember what you did?
Rich
"Geo." wrote in message
news:3f075f40{at}w3.nls.net...
What I'm looking for is for Microsoft to assume the =
responsibility
of
accounting for a current build. I'm tired of having to track =
this
fricken
nightmare patch work of fixes.
Geo.
"Glenn Meadows" wrote in message
news:3f072a14$1{at}w3.nls.net...
I also think that what George is looking for, is a source to =
get a
full
image of the OS that already has the hotfixes/sp's installed =
ready
to
go,
so
when deploying or adding a new machine, you don't have to =
apply all
the
hotfixes/sp's above the level you're installing.
So, if all you have is a Win2kPro SP0 (No SP installed) disk, =
but
have
a
site license that allows 40 clients, and you're now adding =
client
#35,
he'd
like to be able to get a full image of the latest distribution =
(not
have
to
re-purchase same), so when he installs the software on the new
computer,
he
doesn't have to take the next several hours adding SP's, hot =
fixes,
etc.
--=20
Glenn M.
"Rich" wrote in message news:3f071faf{at}w3.nls.net...
Put aside George's silly idea that full installs be made
available
to
him because he is too lazy to create them himself. (See
=
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/support/spde=
ploy.asp
and
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/tools/tools/hfdeploy.asp).
Running a slipstream install does upgrade in place and =
all
users
and
existing software remain. This is how I almost always install
service
packs
when at work.
Rich
"Glenn Meadows" wrote in message
news:3f071d64$1{at}w3.nls.net...
BUT, the problem with doing a "re-install", is that the =
current
builds
and
software do NOT allow you to keep installed software, =
user, etc.
I've
tried
that, mostly to no avail. The ONLY way to get the install =
to
run,
is
to
allow it to delete the NT folder, and all the users, etc. =
You
have
to
re-install your software.
I've found this to be true when trying to do a re-install =
of
Win2KPro
the
SP3 CD build. There is NO upgrade Install option, of =
Win2kPro
is
currently
installed. The ONLY option is to blow away the current =
install,
and
go
through the hassle of a re-install. I have NOT tried =
doing the
SysPrep
based install yet. which allows taking a fully installed =
system,
and
converting it to what is called an OEM image style =
install.
There
is
an
option to force full hardware detect again, so you can =
roll up
pre-installed
systems with all the software installed to new machines. =
This
MIGHT
work to
allow you to change hardware on an existing system and not =
have
to
backup/restore, which doesn't properly bring back stuff =
(or I've
not
figured
out the magic incantation.
On the original Win2kPro NON SP based version CD, you can =
do a
re-install
over the top of the existing OS, and nothing is lost on
installed
apps.
MS
made a change somewhere along the line of Win2KPro to =
prevent a
re-install.
I have a Non-SP Win2kPro CD, and on a system that would =
NOT
allow
without
deleting the existing installation (didn't format the =
disk, just
deleted
all
the Win2K files and started over), I used the original =
Win2KPro
CD,
and
I
was able to re-install the OS. Then had to apply SP3, but
that's
no
real
big deal.
Heck, I've got a license for the machine, a license for =
the
software,
but it
just won't allow an upgrade/repair style install that goes =
over
the
top
of
the existing install.
--
Glenn M.
"Geo." wrote in message
news:3f06fe1c$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> somehow I don't think we are communicating here.. I was =
saying
I
think
MS
> should be putting out a current build full distribution =
ISO
instead
of
this
> stupid barrage of patches and service packs. What I want =
is to
go
to
the
MS
> website, type in my serial number and download in iso =
build of
NT
that
is
> current up to the minute patched so after installing I'm
current.
>
> Geo.
>
> wrote in message
> news:f09845.e36000{at}harborwebs.com...
> > -=3D> Quoting Geo. to Mike '/m' <=3D-
> >
> > Ge> With Windows, MS and their pirate paranoia will =
never
allow
us
to
do
> > Ge> the current distro thing so we have to suffer =
with a 3
year
old
> > Ge> distribution, a service pack, a download of =
current
drivers,
and a
> > Ge> boatload of hotfixes.
> >
> > What do you find unacceptable in Slipstreaming?
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > ... If this post also applies to you, then that's
unintentional
> >
> > --- FMail/386 1.02
+44(0)2082972486
(2:254/235)
>
>
------=_NextPart_000_00CB_01C3457E.E88211A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
SP4
includes the latest =
release of the=20
same version in Windows 2000 which is the download to which I =
referred. =20
The download to which you referred is for a version not included in = Windows=20
2000.
Now if
you were a bit more =
observant=20
you would have noticed on the right side of the page to which you = referred a big=20
blue box labeled "Related Resources" with links to "JScript
5.1 Security = Patch=20
for Windows 2000", "JScript 5.5 Secuity Patch for Windows
2000", "Sec = All=20
Available Security Updates for Windows Script". The first
two are=20 obvious. The last refers to a page that includes links
to all the = updates=20
for the 5.1, 5.5, and 5.6 versions.
Are you ready to =
acknowledge you are=20
wrong yet?
Rich
> > * Origin: Another message via PackLink => > * Origin: Another message via PackLink=20 * Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.