BB>>  LE> I realize that it could be a pain, but I *really* think
BB>> that we
BB>>  LE> need to either have *some* person or persons *certifying*
BB>> software
BB>>  LE> as FTS compliant, or else we need some sort of freely
BB>> available "test
BB>>  LE> suite" that authors can check their software against.
BB>>
BB>> Believe it or not, that was something that used to be done.

 RH> When?  *I* never heard of it.  Tom Jennings did run a Fido12 BBS as
 RH> a test node. I don't think the FTSC actually certified anything,
 RH> ever.

SOMEONE sure used to do it as they held the release of FD up for several
weeks at one time...

)\/(ark