Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:
 JM>> Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:

 BK>>>  ...

 BA>>>>> The only 'defending' Klahn - and I - have been
doing for Sauer is
 BA>>>>> pointing out that most of those who criticize him
for those 65
 BK>>> days of
 JM>>>> service have
 BA>>>>> never served a single minute in the military.

 JM>>>> To bad you can't say that about all who criticize him.

 BK>>>  And those others should know better..


 BA>>>>> Insofar as 'working on A-10s' I've noted in the
past that if he
 BK>>> washed the
 BA>>>>> cockpit plexiglas he 'worked on' the aircraft.

 JM>>>> That would be true but AF records show there were NO A-10's
 JM>>>> at the base where he served his 65 days.

 BK>>>  AF records show there were no flyable A-10s at the base.
 BK>>>  However, there were one or two static A-10s for training, but I
 BK>>>  haven't been able to establish if it was at the same time. I do
 BK>>>  know it was about that time.

 BK>>>  And there was an A-10 unit stationed at that base, but flying
 BK>>>  out of a nearby ANG base. Again, I have not found the exact
 BK>>>  dates.

 BK>>>  Both were around that time.

 JM>> You haven't others have. There were NO A-10's, Static or
 JM>> other wise, until well after he left.

 BK>  Source? I have not yet see anyone give actual dates on any of
 BK>  that.

 JM>> Same with the A-10 unit. It wasn't there until after he
 JM>> left. Just like there were no crashes,he claims to have
 JM>> witnessed.

 BK>  Again, source?

 JM>> You do not believe what you have been told, and can't or

 BK>  With the people who are telling me, and those people being wrong
 BK>  so often, there is no way I am going to believe them without
 BK>  co-oberating sources.

 JM>> won't  find out  for your self.
 JM>> Kinda leaves you flapping you gums in the wind.

 BK>  Without sources to back up what you say you are flapping your
 BK>  gums. I have made it crystal clear where I do not have exact
 BK>  information. You are claiming unsupported assertions as if they
 BK>  were proven fact. Don't work that way in the real world.


I received an E-mail copy of Ross' DD214, back when Richard was alive. I
checked using the dates on Ross' DD214.
I no longer have it, and even if I did I would not pass it along to anyone
just as I would not want mine passed along. I do not care one way or the
other if you believe me. I have satisfied my self that the stories Ross
told are not true. What you think about it doesn't matter,  I believe he's
a liar and have no problem telling anyone, including him.
If that upsets your sensibilities, I'm not even sorry.

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)