In a message dated 28 Oct 96  12:44:20, Dennis Mummert wrote:
RW>I'm suprised no one has called Clinton on this and DEMANDED a hair
RW>sample from Clinton on the spot! Certainly the President of the United
RW>States should not object to a snippet of hair taken off him to be
RW>analyzed.
 DM>        Ummm, wasn't there a bit of legislation a while back
 DM> suggesting that maybe Congresspersons ALSO be subject to the various
 DM> laws? What's good for the goose, and all...
I know the Senate is EXEMPT from the laws they pass and I imagine there is 
similar provisions for the Congresscum.
RW>projects in various states. To attach another condition on receiving the
RW>funds is literal blackmail.
 DM>        Ehehe, rather what I was suggesting.  But, the Fed does things
 DM> that way routinely - vis-a-vis, the Smoke a Joint/Lose yer licence or
 DM> the national speed limit laws, the Clean Air Act, etc, ad nauseam.
Well when you can't do things legally (Constitutionally) then either 
blackmail them or issue a Presidential Directive.
--- DLG Pro v1.15/PDQMail v2.60
(1:209/245)
---------------