Hi,

On 2013-05-15 09:29:41, mark lewis wrote to Wilfred van Velzen:
  about: "FMail OSS??":

 ml>> i seem to have found FMail on sourceforge... is this the same
 ml>> FMail?

 WvV>> You haven't been paying attention to this area, now have you? ;)

 ml> the JAM files for FMAIL_HELP were created on my main system back 17
 ml> Sep 1994 and there's only 75 messages in it in the last 730 day
 ml> period...

 ml> so i took a chance and posted my question(s) in a seemingly dead echo and
 ml> crossed my fingers...

The sourceforge page has been mentioned since march 2008 a couple of times.
I see that you posted around that time in this area. So you could have
known about it...

 ml> did you get my other two or three posts?? this one you answered was
 ml> the last of the ones i sent within minutes of each...

Yes I got them. But it would require me to find some time to look into
these matters, and give you an answer with substance. ;)

 WvV>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/fmail/

 ml> thanks for confirming that ;)

Maybe Scott can add the link to his monthly post, that would help the
readers of this area...

 WvV>> See the readme's.

 ml> you mean the ones buried in the source tree?

I wouldn't call it buried. They are in a doc directory, so easy to spot... ;)

 ml> i have read those and they are the reason i posted my message in here
 ml> in the first place... what confuses me is that other documentation is
 ml> the same as it ever was and only carries folkert's name as well as
 ml> talking about registration being required for certain features...
 ml> based on that,

These registered functions weren't changed in that release. I didn't touch
the manual at all, just added the ReadMe.GPL.txt.

But I agree with you the archives with the binaries are a bit lean. That
could be inproved in a later release.


Bye, Wilfred.


--- FMail-W32-1.64-B20111120