BG> Not at all.  What's happened is that because you loaded the SDL with a 
BG> locked baud rate of 57600, that has also been written to NVRAM.  If you 
BG> attempt to run it at 38400, you'll get a baud rate mismatch until you issue 
                                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
BG> any AT command to match the speeds.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    
I have done that Bill, it is a bug.    

PE> I mean, the bloody thing is accepting my ATZ etc, and even
PE> responds with "OK", it's just the "RING" that it decides
PE> to send at a different baud rate.  Bizaare!  BFN.  Paul.

BG> Not really.  It's a strange quirk with the USRs (dunno if it applies to 

What I am describing is a bug.  There is an INTERESTING THING
in that the RINGs will come in at the baud rate of last &W
*IF* there has been no intervening AT command on presumably
all modems, because they have to send it at some baud rate,
and don't know what the user wants yet, so they take a guess.

What I am describing is a *BUG*.  It is not adapting to the AT
commands.  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---