Joe Siegler wrote in a message to Patrick McCullough:
JS> Hello Patrick.
JS> 25 Mar 97 23:36, Patrick McCullough wrote to Jonathan Fingas: 
 >  (Everyone can bash me for thinking ROTT is better, but it's not going
 >  to change how I feel.  I just wish I'd played ROTT first.  There
 > would have been no need to bother with Doom.)
JS> Did you ever get the Extreme ROTT addon pack we put out?   If not,
JS> you should get it.  It's 42 new levels for ROTT by Tom Hall & myself
JS> (I did 15, Tom did the rest), and it includes 3 level editors, maps,
JS> and other cool stuff. 
 Nope, I don't even have a full version of ROTT yet.  Still saving my
 pennies to buy it, though that has slowed now that my CD-ROM drive
 is dead.  First things first, you know.  :(
 But I have read your previous posts on the Extreme pack and I /will/
 be getting that.  :)~~~ 
 >  ROTT, Duke3d, and Descent all seem quite happy with my system.  :)
JS> I wish all gamers were like this.  Too many people want to go "That
JS> game sucks, only this is any good".   Too bad people have to be
JS> closed minded like that. There's far more room out there for more
JS> than just one game. 
 Darn right!  If it plays well, I'll play it.  If the plot works -or
 even if it doesn't, as long as the gameplay or graphics or _something_
 works, I'll play it.  Keep it and/or buy it -that's another story.
 You should see the "My system is better than yours!" junk going on
 in the Vid_Game echo.  To some of those people, gamePLAY means
 nothing so long as it's a "Brand X" game.   It's pathetic.
JS> Hell, I played Blake Stone today!  :)
 Never played that one.  I'll grab it and give a whirl.  What have I
 got to lose but a few megs of HD space?  
 Patrick
--- timEd/386 1.10
---------------