In an eruption typical of his character, Andrew Cummins posted:
 BS> I'll note your complete failure to ask for any.
 AC> Actually, I believe I did ask in the original post.
 BS> Actually, you didn't.  I double checked before I posted that, just
 BS> to make sure I wasn't falsely accusing you.
 AC> I call upon Relatif Tuinn to be my first witness to testify that
 AC> you are a liar.  What follows is Tuinn's reply to my original
 AC> message.  You'll note the line "If so, what is your evidence?"
 AC> You see, you don't even have to take my word for it (as if I
 AC> reposted the original):
    Ah, but you didn't repost the original, you posted an edited version
 of the original.  Your line "If so, what is your evidence?" did not
 fall immediately below your question about the negro race's ability to
 compete.  It fell below another question you asked later.  Either you
 edited the message to seem otherwise, or you quoted one that Relatif
 edited.
    Either way, I am not a liar.  I have no reason to lie.  This is a
 damned *hobby* and I have nothing to prove here, especially to
 argumentative, belligerent schmucks like you.  I may occasionally be
 mistaken, but I'm not deceptive.  The fact that you assume the worst
 further demonstrates your utter lack of character and your complete
 misunderstanding of the one you profess to follow.  You may follow
 Paul, but you don't follow Jesus.
    Anyway, if the very next post I receive from you on this topic is
 anything less than an apology to me, I will apply my twit filter on
 your name.  You will be ignored by my system.
... Penny for your thoughts..  Hey! You owe me some change!
--- PPoint 2.05
---------------