In a deposition submitted under oath, Richard Meic said:
 BS> Then my observations about Rice, et al, are proved correct.  He is
 BS> confused.  What he calls atheism is really agnosticism.  All
 BS> babies are born without knowledge of God, and that is agnosticism,
 BS> not atheism.
 RM> "Proved" perhaps, perhaps not - "supported", I'll go with that.
    Well, even though there is a fine line between overwhelming
 anecdotal evidence proving or merely supporting a theory, I'll bow to
 your correction.  For now...  ;^)
 RM>  BE>> This, I believe, is the whole trick to understanding what has
 RM>  BE>> been going on over there in Holysmoke.
 BS> And no one here gives a flying f*ck what goes on over in Holypoke.
 RM> Kudos!
    Thank you.
... I am logged on, therefore I am.
--- PPoint 2.05
---------------