Hello Ward!

28 Dec 02 03:23, you wrote to me:

 >> Ah but the fact that you were on Satti's case like white on rice was
 >> obvious and that you would be the next IC was a foregone
 >> conclusion.. :)

 WD> There had been some internal ZC-talk and I had nominated ZC4 before
 WD> because he was very neutral and Z4 hadn't had the IC-mandate yet. ZC4
 WD> declined and nominated me. That is how it went (and it is not the
 WD> first time this needed clarifying).

As I tried to imply.. :), the way it "seemed" is how I described
it to you above, the underlying political under-currents may have been
different, but if I were in Las Vegas, I would have put my money on how I
described it above and I would have won.. 

I mean no disrespect or offense, just relating to you how it
"seemed" from a observers standpoint, a observer whose viewpoint
was from the cheap seats.. 

==
Ross
BBS -> http://www.the-estar.com - telnet://the-estar.com
rosscassell{at}mailshell.com | ICQ = 5305939
... Using yesterday's technology to solve today's problems, tomorrow
--- GoldED+/W32 1.1.5-21006