On 27/07/2016 12:39 PM, Janis Kracht -> Michiel van der Vlist wrote:

 >>> And that just circles around to section IV, and a string of additional
 >>> "shall" statements getting violated....

 >> I see no violation. What I do see is that an essential element is
 >> missing at the top of the "shall pyramid".  There is no IC.

 JK> We don't need an IC since the ZCs can take a vote to take action or not
 JK> or not as already demonstrated, and as been already been done without
 JK> the benefit of an IC.

The ZCs have no authority when it comes to echomail.

-- 

Regards
David

E&OE

--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0