MB> Only with the introduction of a 386-specific OS/2 2.0 -- five years
 MB> after it should have been done -- did OS/2 become a reasonable
 MB> contender.   While OS/2 1.x had technological brilliance, it was
 MB> obviously also a dead-end.  

Thanks for sharing.  The more it goes, the more I see that Microsoft are
the worst people to compete against, but their Windows products are widely
supported; unlike OS/2's.  It's unfortunate that OS/2 doesn't have support
for Windows apps built in also.  Theres one program that I want to run
under OS/2, but it is a Windows app, and I don't want to waste the hard
drive space for just one program.  But it is very powerful, and I love the
system very much.

Eric Theriault
FX Bulletin Board Systems
Software Development Incorporated
Voice:  603-882-4880
BBS:    603-882-3859
Fax:    603-882-3859
E-mail: info{at}fxbbs.com 
--- GEcho 1.11+