Hello Janis,

On Tuesday July 26 2016 21:39, you wrote to me:

 >>> And that just circles around to section IV, and a string of
 >>> additional "shall" statements getting violated....

 >> I see no violation. What I do see is that an essential element is
 >> missing at the top of the "shall pyramid".  There is no IC.

 JK> We don't need an IC

I did not say we need one, just that we do not have one.

 JK> since the ZCs can take a vote to take action or not or not as already
 JK> demonstrated, and as been already been done without the benefit of an
 JK> IC.

Without an IC, the ZCC is a toothless tiger. The only "teeth" that the ZCC has
is the authority to overrule a ruling made by the IC. Without an IC, thet are
no IC rulings and so there is nothing to overrule.

Any formal decision or ruling process stops at the desk of the ZC. The ZCC does
not have the authority to overrule a ZC. If a ZC makes a decision the other ZCs
don't like, they can stamp their feet. That is all they can do.


Cheers, Michiel

--- GoldED+/W32-MSVC 1.1.5-b20130111