John Massey -> Bob Klahn wrote:
 JM> Bob Klahn -> John Massey wrote:

 BK>>  ...

 BA>>>> The only 'defending' Klahn - and I - have been doing for Sauer is
 BA>>>> pointing out that most of those who criticize him for those 65
 BK>> days of
 JM>>> service have
 BA>>>> never served a single minute in the military.

 JM>>> To bad you can't say that about all who criticize him.

 BK>>  And those others should know better..


 BA>>>> Insofar as 'working on A-10s' I've noted in the past that if he
 BK>> washed the
 BA>>>> cockpit plexiglas he 'worked on' the aircraft.

 JM>>> That would be true but AF records show there were NO A-10's
 JM>>> at the base where he served his 65 days.

 BK>>  AF records show there were no flyable A-10s at the base.
 BK>>  However, there were one or two static A-10s for training, but I
 BK>>  haven't been able to establish if it was at the same time. I do
 BK>>  know it was about that time.

 BK>>  And there was an A-10 unit stationed at that base, but flying
 BK>>  out of a nearby ANG base. Again, I have not found the exact
 BK>>  dates.

 BK>>  Both were around that time.

 JM> You haven't others have. There were NO A-10's, Static or other wise,
 JM> until well after he left.

 JM> Same with the A-10 unit. It wasn't there until after he left.
 JM> Just like there were no crashes,he claims to have witnessed.

 JM> You do not believe what you have been told, and can't or won't  find out
 JM>  for your self.
 JM> Kinda leaves you flapping you gums in the wind.

Of course the real reason that Klahn "supports" Otto has nothing
to do with whether Klahn believes Otto or even cares about it. The *REAL*
reason is that it is people who disagree with *KLAHN* picking on Otto. Otto
must be defended at any cost. If you were to suddenly start supporting
Obama and stopped arguing with Klahn he'd turn on Otto in a New York
minute!

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net

http://www.myspace.com/fcpnmimi

Whatcha reading?

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)