>>> It does not say that there must be a NEC. Obviously if there is no
>>> NEC, the part that says the NEC shall maintain a list does not
>>> apply.

>> And that just circles around to section IV, and a string of additional
>> "shall" statements getting violated....

> I see no violation. What I do see is that an essential element is missing at
> the top of the "shall pyramid".  There is no IC.

We don't need an IC since the ZCs can take a vote to take action or not or not
as already demonstrated, and as been already been done without the benefit of
an IC.

--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-2