| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | USR 28.8 Modems |
BL> We were arguing about the specific time (1987-88?) when Telecom BL> was challenged by importers. Until then, they claimed the right BL> to vet all equipment connected to Telecom lines, and were using BL> it to prevent competition. They lost the court case. DW> I know they did vet people, when i was on viatel, one DW> of the SIGOPS had his site closed down because he was DW> using non approved modems on viatels own system BL> That's right! It turned out that Telecom was doing that illegally. Pigs arse it did. There was NEVER a time when say Netcomm didnt bother to have Telecom approved modems because they didnt have that power. BL> There was nothing in the Act that gave them the power. Poor senile old Bob. @EOT: ---* Origin: afswlw rjfilepwq (3:711/934.2) SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.