| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | m34f |
On Jun 06, 1996 at 07:44, Bill Grimsley of 3:640/305.9 wrote:
db>> I'm still splitting my sides after reading Dave Hatch's comment
- "the
db>> modems are fine, as long as you keep the manufacturer away from
'em".
db>> ROFL!! ;-)
BG> I doubt that USR were equally as amused though.
Their problem .. if nothing else, it just serves to prove that USR are as
fallable as the other modem manufacturers. :-)
BG> Especially as it looks very much like they'll need to go back to USR for
BG> repair. I bet they're sorry they didn't socket the flash-ROM chip now...
At what cost to users (considering USR didn't force the users to flash the
new firmware into their modems)?
- dave
d.begley{at}ieee.org
---
* Origin: [ epicentre of the universe -- sydney australia ] (3:711/934.4)SEEN-BY: 711/934 @PATH: 711/934 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.