| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Writers` strike could happen soon |
In article , Aleks A.-Lessmann wrote: > On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:32:34 -0000, Dan Dassow wrote: > >I wonder whether The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarbanes-Oxley_Act ) may be applicable. > > There's an idea... Using SOx against that kind of thing... But as far as > I remember from implementing SOx it's more about risk control and truth > in numbers than about controlling money flows. OTOH I never read the SOx > act thru, so I may have missed about that. > > Aleks The SOx act only impacts on how they audit and account for things for purposes of SEC filings. The tax accounting only cares about how they account for things for tax purposes. What internal games they play within the context of accounting for contractural and pay out purposes is beyond the authority (or the desire for that matter) of these acts. It a private matter based on what the contract says and what the courts will let them get away with. Any other discussion is beside the point. --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: Time Warp of the Future BBS - Home of League 10 (1:14/400) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/300 400 34/999 90/1 106/1 120/228 123/500 134/10 140/1 SEEN-BY: 222/2 226/0 229/4000 236/150 249/303 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 SEEN-BY: 261/1410 1417 1418 266/1413 280/1027 320/119 393/11 633/104 260 262 SEEN-BY: 633/267 690/682 734 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/109 200 SEEN-BY: 2800/18 2905/0 @PATH: 14/400 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.