-=> Janis Kracht wrote to James Bradley <=-

...
 JK> (kind of like Gates saying years ago, no one will need any
 JK> more that 64K .

I've read that that is a misquote, or more like a quote from some big-wig at
IBM, Wyse, or some such.

...
 > is in the boardroom who pee themselves a little every
 > time they erect another > hurdle for a claimant.

 JK> but they are so good at doing just that.. Lol.

Erecting hurdles, or wearing concealing dark suits so they can hide their glee?


...
 > told, I was standing in an emergency ward for fourteen hours that week.
 > (Preexisting condition makes sitting next to impossible.)

 JK> That's a drag..

*Fit* to be dragged, more like it. 

...
 >pay-to-stay-alive system might not be so bad. But most of
 >my health trouble ha > been iatrogenic in nature,

 JK> That's scary.. You wonder about the 'do no harm'..

Three cases that I could prove in court, and counting. Their legal 'slush fund'
is so prosperous, they could tie it up in appeals until I'm too dead to spend
any reward. What'er you gonna do, eh? (Can you tell you're talkin' to a
Canadian now? B-)

...
 JK> hehe.. "pay to stay alive".. Great term for the nonsense
that is called
 JK> insurance in the USA .  I submitted another claim for
 JK> physical therapy my neurolgist ordered .. The bill is for
 JK> over $450.  While it's covered under our plan, the bill
 JK> went to my deductible.  So we have to pay it.  What a lark.
 JK> It's not enough that the ampyra cost is $1100/month, why
 JK> would they apply that to my deductible.  They might have to
 JK> pay for something 

Now I *know* I'm talkin' to a Yankee. 


... James
___ MultiMail/Linux v0.49

--- Maximus 3.01