From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: YourName{at}YourISP.com (Your Name)
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

In article , Lance Corporal Hammer
Schultz  wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:16:41 +1200, Your Name wrote:
> 
> > If they want to make a "Star Trek" show, then it MUST
fit with what has
> > come before, and not via same lame, half-assed time travel excuse that
> > doesn't work thanks to all the other silly changes and inconsistencies.
> 
> Yeah, cuz Trek has never had inconsistent time travel / alternate
> universe stories in it, ever ever.
> 
> Whatever.  You don't actually even know if you don't like it because
> you won't watch it.  I, on the other hand, watched it and decided I
> can easily make space for yet another alternate dimension in the Trek
> multi-canon for this re-boot.  The pre-movie graphic novel with
> LaForge (Countdown to Darkness) is no less "plausible" in a Trek sense
> than any of the other innumerable reset-button plots that have
> preceded it.  Works for me.

"Into the Darkness" is *SO* incredibly bad and not going to sell that the
local Amazon-clone webstore here in New Zealand (MightyApe.co.nz) is
already resorting to runing a competition where one buyer of the movie
will win an Apple iPad and another 10 will win a wireless mini-keyboard.  
:-\
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux