...

BK>>>You are the one who called him a 'pathological liar'.

TR>>>And so he is. I did not put the `mental illness' definition
on it. *You*
TR>>>did, just recently.

BK>>Which is exactly what it is.

 TR> Ok........lets go with this `exactly what it is' scenario
 TR> for a short distance.

 TR> First of all....I'd have to know exactly what your medical
 TR> degree is in. Are you an MD with a specialty in psychiatry?
 TR> On what do you base your `medical diagnosis? How long have
 TR> you been treating Sauer for this mental illness of his?

 Before you question me on any of it, deny it. Claim it is not a
 mental disorder.

 ...

TR>> Federal and most state laws on firearms forbid individuals

BK>>Note that the digression from the subject shows his pathological
BK>>fixation on attack by any means available.

 TR> Secondly....that wasn't any `diversion', its a pretty scary

 It is a diversion from the topic under discussion.

 ...

 TR> Being the upright, law-abiding individual you always claim
 TR> you are....you should be greatly concerned with that.

 When did I claim that?

 TR> If Sauer is, in fact, `mentally ill' (as you are now
 TR> claiming), lets see him gotten into a closely supervised
 TR> treatment program of some sort.

 Not all mentally ill people require "closely supervised"
 anything. There are degrees you know. Is Mimi in a closely
 supervised treatment program?

 ...

 TR> One of the specific questions on that declaration document
 TR> openly asks if you suffer from a mental illness. In order
 TR> to purchase and take possession of afirearm, Sauer would
 TR> have had to state `NO' to that question; knowing that was
 TR> false. Which makes the document a deliberate falsification
 TR> on his part: a felony.

 If he is compelled to lie, as you suggest, by reason of mental
 defect or disorder, then he would not be guilty of a crime.

 TR> Diversion? Not hardly.

 Yes, it is.

 TR> You can't have it both ways: Either
 TR> Sauer is a deliberately provocative, lying braggart, whos
 TR> every claim and statement is a lie......or Sauer is
 TR> mentally ill, and feloniously purchased, owns, and is in
 TR> possession of firearms, unlawfully.

 I never disputed that point. Nor did I admit it. I did not
 discuss it at all.

 Nor do I see any reason to.


BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a