Paul, at 09:24 on Feb 02 1996, you wrote to Bill Grimsley...

PE> [fx: falling flat on face]

PE> [fx: falling flat on face]

PE> You really have a pat line in bullshit, Bill.

You can really be a childish, obnoxious little turd sometimes Paul.

BG> Nope, all you've proved (and you really haven't even proved that) is that 
BG> ONE modem exhibits a problem calling USRs.  Apart from Rod's archaic Supra, 
BG> neither Dave nor I have EVER seen that problem before.

PE> Before you'd never seen the problem EVER.  Now it's "Apart from
PE> Rod's modem".  Well done, Bill.  Just shows how much value your
PE> original argument of "no-one else has EVER seen the problem" is, eh?

For Christ's sake, grow up Paul.  Rod's problem occurred fucking MONTHS
after I'd been testing those 100s of modems at CHH.

BG> If somebody else eventually complains about the SAME problem, then I might 
BG> start listening, but until then, I'm simply no longer interested.

PE> Oh great, Rod's modem suddenly developed SERIOUSLY FLAWS straight
PE> after my Thunder fried, so it's now an "irrelevant modem". 

Enjoying yourself, are you?  Holding a rational conversation with you is
becoming next to impossible.  

PE> Nice one, Bill.  About the same level of support I got from MBE.  THEY
PE> had never seen the double-sending bug, even the bastards at Digicom
PE> had never seen the double-sending bug, so it was irrelevant.

I give up.  EOT.

Regards, Bill

--- Msgedsq/2 3.20