From: "Antti Kurenniemi" 

"Geo."  wrote in message
news:3f8f3b4f$1{at}w3.nls.net...
> > They get bored ?  I don't know - how does that have anything to do
with
> > this? Surely just about half the world can read my emails already (a
> > sysadmin friend once showed me how it's done - pretty easy, and mighty
> > scary), so what's the difference? Or are you saying that they would have
a
> > hard time reading my email because of MS's implementation of this sort
of
> > "lock"? Ha ha. It will probably take less than an hour
before there are
> > tools in the web to break this "protection".
>
> I'm saying if this is supposed to protect documents, then it would have to
> keep the feds from reading emails or documents or it will never be taken
> seriously.

Oh okay then. I'll vote for it never to be taken seriously. I mean, wasn't
there a "crack" for the Windows XP product activation available
before the product was even shipping? I expect a similar scenario: this
will only work for "common" people. Those who want to crack the
protection will be able to do so.

I mean, pretty much every protection scheme can be broken, so why should
this one be any different?


Antti Kurenniemi
(I won't take it seriously, that's for sure)

--- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5