[ The following text is in the "ISO-8859-15" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-1" character set.  ]
    [ Some special characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/3/2010 7:41 PM, jjs{at}xmission.com wrote:
> The way it should work is not with a write-in. It should be the last
> choice on the actual ballot for every office. If "none of the above"
> wins, there is a special election in mid December for that office. Those
> that were on the original ballot are not eligible to run on the second,
> and write-ins for them are not counted.

I've been in favor of exactly this for a long time.  If nothing else, it
would cut down on negative campaigning, as the effect of negative
campaigning would change from 'my opponent is so awful you have no
choice but to vote for me' to 'Vote for None Of The Above'.

Ben
- -- 
Ben Coleman oloryn{at}benshome.net | For the wise man, doing right trumps
http://oloryn.benshome.net/     | looking right.  For the fool, looking
Amateur Radio NJ8J              | right trumps doing right.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iD8DBQFNGmYKVFJ6Ro3/tZMRAtH7AJ9Cz+AL84u7B/YZUgtWiotDnAkzvQCdG31F
ZjHd/4eb4SXQfLXt85iwoqw=
=Tz3t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32