On 10-24-08, BOB KLAHN said to TIM RICHARDSON:


BK>...


TR> *I* wasn't the one who claimed Sauer had a mental illness;
TR> *Sauer* did:


BK>You are the one who called him a 'pathological liar'.


And so he is. I did not put the `mental illness' definition on it. *You* did,
just recently.


I used the term `pathological liar' to say that he is an habitual, continuous
liar, who is doing his lying deliberately, without any `desease' or `mental
illness' connected to it.


He does it now because you and Ceppa-hole protect him in his lying ways, not
to mention a few others.


The problem has become more you, and Ceppa-hole, and Ackley, and Wilson,
encouraging him to greater lies by your continued pathetic defense of his
claims you know full well cannot possibly be true.


I'd have thought you who did commitments of hitches in the Air Force would
take a lot more pride in your service, than to let some putrid little pisshead
puff up a grand total of 65 days in the Air Force before going home to mommy,
into all the bullshit Sauer has done. I can believe Ackley's `if he washed the
windscreen on an A-10 once......he worked on Warthogs', only in the sense that
Ackley isn't real bright (neither are you, for that matter).


I once helped fuel up a C-130 in Vietnam. I don't consider myself any expert
on C-130's.


More than once I coupled and uncoupled the carry harness for Huey's and
Chinooks, because there wasn't anyone else standing right there to do it
quickly and operations were `rolling' at the time. That didn't make me a
`chopper jockey'.


Now you're reaching for this mental illness' mantra, and trying to turn it
around for Sauer, to make his enemies `guilty' for telling him he's a liar.


Are you `that' desperate for allies?













---
*Durango b301 #PE*