-> You aren't even bright enough to realize that "not even one" is to
-> emphasize including more than one.

Many, many people are bright enough to realize that your sentence came
out as gibberish.  What you said originally was "not one," which is a
condition that can be met by any number other than one.  I pointed out
your error.  You implicitly admitted your error when you REVISED your
claim to "not even one."  So for you to walk away mumbling about whether
anyone ELSE is or is not bright, well, gee, that is just the HEIGHT of
irony!

And that is just ONE of the MANY reasons why so many people laugh at
your posts!

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10