Re: CG Learn and Fidonews
By: Allen Prunty to Michiel van der Vlist on Sun Jul 24 2016 01:14 pm
AP> I may be the wierdo in Zone 1 because Echopol1 does have a lot of things
AP> that I agree on... It clearly states that an echolist shall be kept...
AP> probably to prevent the "hijacking" complaints that I mentioned above. You
AP> say we shouldn't tell you how to read echopol1. MANY in Z2 have thrust
AP> that document in our faces to prove their point. But by saying "don't tell
AP> us how to read it" breaks any legitimacy that the document has either
AP> follow your policy or don't. I'm big at saying you can't have it both
AP> ways.
I like the idea of an echolist independent of any one distribution method -
NAB, othernets, a loose confederation of sysops in Z1, Z2, NAB, whoever.
Establishing a list where the list is managed and not *owned* by the curator is
the challenge, IMO. It could be too tempting to use management of the list as a
power-grab.
--- SBBSecho 3.00-Win32
* Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/700)
|