~>  EC> You are still lying.  The decision was not based on
~>  EC> anything he said about your post, nor on anything anyone
~>  EC> else "swore" to. It was solely based on what you said, and
~>  EC> your inability to back it up or retract it.

~>  He falsely portrayed my comments

You are still lying, and you are lying in a blind manner without even
trying to read the post.  The decision was made on the verbatim text what
you said, not any "portrayal" of it.

~>  Blatan lie. The moderator did not say one thing against my
~>  comment until Hardegree lied about it.

As you know but choose to ignore, he doesn't read the echo on a daily
basis.  He may have reacted when he read it, or he may have reacted when I
pointed out that your lie was not just a lie and an attack but (given what
the victim of your lie was doing for an income at the time) was actionable
defamation.  I believe I even pointed him to a couple of successful
defamation suits in similar circumstances.  But the decision that you in
fact broke the rules was not based on what I said or on any "portrayal" of
what you said.  YOUR exact words were quoted back to you several times, and
you were given several opportunities to support or retract your claim.  You
didn't have the ability to do the former, and you didn't have the integrity
to do the latter.

You already know all of this, and it has all been revisited several times
since then.  I point it out again only to clarify the matter for anyone who
missed it at the time and may fall into believing your lies.  And I point
it out again to illustrate the fact that you were lying then and you are
lying now.
 
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a