Hi, Paul.

PE> PE> PE> Keep the latest one, for the Binkley/Squish/Msged route, which

PE> PE> FM> Sure, but what's the diff in the .CFG and the README?

PE> PE> Probably I upgraded for a later version of MSGED.  I don't
PE> PE> remember every enhancement I make to every "product" I
PE> PE> have.  BFN.  Paul.

PE> FM> You should. I'd put documentation, especially change documentation, at
PE> a
PE> FM> priority above (your views on) only writing ISO C.

PE> You can do diffs on the two versions if you want.  I have
PE> GNUDIFF available here.

Identifying changed source code is *not* documenting the changes, what
bugs were fixed, features added, etc.

PE> FM> I've binned minpdos, minpdos2 was a month recenter.

PE> Ok, then you want to rename minpdos2.zip to minpdos.zip, because

Does that imply that the later README in minpdos2 (the one I've kept) is
irrelevant or wrong? I mean, if you've kept minpdos, you'll have the old
README.

PE> I have sent a new minpdos2.zip to you, which is the alternative.

It only contains 1 file, as I've mentioned - POINT.TXT.

 * * That's not a bug, it's a FEATURE!
@EOT:

---