14 Nov 96 00:11, Paul Edwards wrote to andrew clarke:

 >>> LK> (1:2/3.4{at}fidonet)

 >> Adding "{at}fidonet" to the origin address is like adding
"{at}fidonet"
 >> to the INTL line.  Wrong!

 ac>> Wrong?  How so?

 > You can't go changing an already-defined control line.  You have to 
 > come up with a new one.  BFN.  Paul.

Yes, with INTL, but how is adding {at}fidonet to the origin address changing
an already-defined control line?  While it isn't in common use, it is
specifying the complete network address of the originating system (as
requested by FTS-4).  The authors of FSC-74 appear to agree with this. 

This is the first time I've heard anybody say that my origin line (or the
origin line generated by the Xenia Mailer reader, and no doubt numerous
other mail creation software, for that matter) is technically invalid, I'd
like to know why.  :-)

--- Msged/2 4.00