PE> It may well not be documented, but the response to the "ATZ"
PE> command DEFINITELY does EXACTLY THAT.  And you still haven't
PE> managed to grasp the fact that I'm not talking about "incoming
PE> calls", I'm talking about the word "RING". 

BG> And how do you expect the Courier to show RING in the absence of an 
BG> incoming call ?  ESP perhaps ?  Even the Couriers aren't quite that 
BG> clever...

PE> So what are you quoting AT&B2 for all the time? 

BG> Read what I said above, then answer the question (if you can).  If no call 
BG> is incoming, how the fuck is ANY modem going to show a RING response?

It was in relation to what &B2 said about "incoming calls".  It
was referring to what happened AFTER a connect, not the speed
that the "RING" was sent at.  You thought that was well worth
quoting at me all the time.  Come to think of it, &B2 did
different things depending on the connect speed, e.g. 2400 vs
28800.  So it changed "RING" speed depending on what it thought
it was going to connect at, eh?  BFN.  Paul.
@EOT:

---