| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | hard drive |
Hi Paul, PE> PE> DG>> Speeding up the 64/128 is not really PE> RG> There was/is a product available PE> RG> called Turbomaster, this will speed up PE> RG> the C64 to 4mhz. (don't work in C128 mode). PE> Actually there was a bit of confusion there, True.. I was simply trying to correct DG's mistake. PE> PE> DG>> can connect a CMD hard disk via a PE> PE> DG>> *parrallel* interface - speed Hd PE> PE> DG>> access up by 7 or 8 times! Mucho faster! PE> PE>> Hi Rod, you didn't mention anything about PE> PE>> the above. Care to comment? BFN. PE> RG> What am I supposed to comment on ? PE> Not telling me that there was a way to PE> get an 7-fold speed increase is a PE> fairly major omission! True, *but* I didn't think you were interested in getting a ramlink as well as a HD so it wasn't worth a mention. Besides, the HD's can load a 200 block program in less than 8 seconds. Since this is an abnormally large program for the C64 I don't consider it worth the expense of a ramlink merely to reduce this load time down to <1sec. PE> RG> a parallel cable if you also have a PE> RG> Ramlink, this makes 'em 7 or 8 PE> RG> times faster loading. PE> PE> And why would you lose compatibility by doing that? BFN. It basically depends on the program. Adding the parallel link is introducing yet another incompatibilty factor. (Although in practice I haven't had a failed load with the paralel cable that was overcome by relying only on the serial link. PE> P.S. The hard disk prices, provided by PE> Exceldata, if I wrote them down PE> correctly, were: PE> prices for CMD hard disks: PE> 245meg $1395 PE> 170meg $1150 PE> 85meg $995 Wow, and to think that when I bought mine I paid almost $1500 for 40 megs ! :-( PE> If that is correct, I will get the 170 PE> meg drive, as the jump from 85 to 170 Or you can toy with my offer.. you buy me an FD4000 and 20 ED disks, and I'll do a straight swap with one on my 40meg drives. PE> P.P.S. Some people talk about a "parallel PE> port". Do they mean the User Port PE> or the Expansion Port? Tricky question 'cos both ports can be considered parallel depending what and how you have things hooked up... the user port is connected to the CIA's and any access must be done via these chips.. thr Cartridge port has the CPU address lines fed to it so is more suitable for expansion. The Ramlink has its own parallel port. Cheers Rod ___ QWKRR128 V4.0 [R] --- EzyQwk V1.02* Origin: WOW BBS - Commodore Suport, Sydney's West (3:713/888) SEEN-BY: 50/99 54/54 711/807 808 809 934 712/623 713/317 700 805 888 @PATH: 713/888 54/54 711/808 809 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.