DD> Isn't a bug an error in the programming where
DD> the software does not behave as documented?

Nope, I dont recall too many spreadsheets whose documentation
claimed that it would produce the right answer to 32*44, but
it would be a bug if they got the wrong answer Dave.

I dont recall too many wordprocessors which claimed that their wp
wouldnt randomly drop occasional paras. If one did, it would be a bug.

DD> Where in the documentation does it say that incomming
DD> calls will communicate with the computer/terminal at
DD> the speed set by the last AT command?

Its the normal practice with Hayes command set modems Dave.

Its even done by USRs except when the AT command is ATZ.

Boy do you look hilarious face down in the mud like that Dave |-)

I TOLD you that its a dangerous business to copy the Blob.

DD> Is there any mention of the speed reverting
DD> to that set by the last NVRAM write?

Not for the RING text Dave.
@EOT:

---