Hi, Paul.

PE> FM> Well, back to slow this morning. 3 times, same result. Then as I
PE> started
PE> FM> to d/l the mail, I kept getting "data sub-packet too
long". I was
PE> FM> obviously going to take nearly 100 years to d/l, so aborted. About to
PE> FM> try again.

PE> I could see the resends on the 3rd attempt.  You connected with
PE> MNP instead of LAPM (V42) on that attempt BTW.  Not very nice.
PE> And I'm loathe to blame you for running under Windows and
PE> missing interrupts, because it is 1200 bps and you normally
PE> handle 19200 bps without problem.  BFN.  Paul.

Yeah and that's still the case, and was then, and now the problem's gone
away. Which is good from a FIM POV, but not good from a trying-to-fix-it
-or-at-leas-find-the-cause POV.

Regards, FIM.

 * * Just Visiting This Planet . . .
@EOT:

---