From Newsgroup: alt.tv.star-trek.tos
From Address: YourName{at}YourISP.com (Your Name)
Subject: Re: Star Trek Into Darkness

In article ,
nyc2001{at}nuttyyahoo.isr wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:52:59 -0700 (PDT), Will Dockery
>  wrote:
> >On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 2:07:06 PM UTC-4,
wheresou...{at}israels.wars wrote:
> >> 
> >> You misspelled, "retarded".
> >
> >I just saw the film a second time, and actually can't complain.
> >
> >Looks like a set up for a bit of Managerie and Search For Spock 
> >(now Search For Pike?).
> >
> >Spock's mind meld with the dying Admiral pike.
> >
> >Khan blood being so good for reviving dead characters.
> >
> >And maybe... Carol Marcus is already pregnant by the end of the film?
> >
> >Some trouble with Tribbles next up?
> >
> >The debut of Christine Chappel?
> 
> Whatever, dude.
> 
> I thought it sucked hickory smoked horse buttholes from a cup.
> 
> See my review (05-26-13).

Wow! You're being mighty generaous ... Abrams' so-called "Star Trek"
doesn't reach even those 'heoghts' of quality.
--- Synchronet 3.15a-Linux NewsLink 1.92-mlp
--- SBBSecho 2.12-Linux